WebApi
WebApi copied to clipboard
Bump Newtonsoft.Json from 10.0.3 to 13.0.1 in /test/UnitTest/Microsoft.AspNet.OData.Test.Shared
Bumps Newtonsoft.Json from 10.0.3 to 13.0.1.
Release notes
Sourced from Newtonsoft.Json's releases.
13.0.1
- New feature - Add JsonSelectSettings with configuration for a regex timeout
- Change - Remove portable assemblies from NuGet package
- Change - JsonReader and JsonSerializer MaxDepth defaults to 64
- Fix - Fixed throwing missing member error on ignored fields
- Fix - Fixed various nullable annotations
- Fix - Fixed annotations not being copied when tokens are cloned
- Fix - Fixed naming strategy not being used when deserializing dictionary enum keys
- Fix - Fixed serializing nullable struct dictionaries
- Fix - Fixed JsonWriter.WriteToken to allow null with string token
- Fix - Fixed missing error when deserializing JToken with a contract type mismatch
- Fix - Fixed JTokenWriter when writing comment to an object
12.0.3
- New feature - Added support for nullable reference types
- New feature - Added KebabCaseNamingStrategy
- Change - Package now uses embedded package icon
- Fix - Fixed bug when merging JToken with itself
- Fix - Fixed performance of calling ICustomTypeDescriptor.GetProperties
- Fix - Fixed serializing Enumerable.Empty and empty arrays on .NET Core 3.0
- Fix - Fixed deserializing some collection types with constructor
- Fix - Fixed deserializing IImmutableSet to ImmutableHashSet instead of ImmutableSortedSet
- Fix - Fixed deserializing IImmutableDictionary to ImmutableDictionary instead of ImmutableSortedDictionary
- Fix - Fixed deserializing into constructors with more than 256 parameters
- Fix - Fixed hang when deserializing JTokenReader with preceding comment
- Fix - Fixed JSONPath scanning with nested indexer
- Fix - Fixed deserializing incomplete JSON object to JObject
- Fix - Fixed using StringEnumConverter with naming strategy and specified values
12.0.2
- New feature - Added MissingMemberHandling to JsonObjectAttribute and JsonObjectContract
- New feature - Added constructor to JTokenReader to specify initial path
- New feature - Added JsonProperty.IsRequiredSpecified
- New feature - Added JsonContract.InternalConverter
- Change - Moved embedded debug symbols in NuGet package to a symbol package on NuGet.org
- Fix - Fixed deserializing nullable struct collections
- Fix - Fixed memory link when serializing enums to named values
- Fix - Fixed error when setting JsonLoadSettings.DuplicatePropertyNameHandling to Replace
12.0.1
- New feature - Added NuGet package signing
- New feature - Added Authenticode assembly signing
- New feature - Added SourceLink support
- New feature - Added constructors to StringEnumConverter for setting AllowIntegerValue
- New feature - Added JsonNameTable and JsonTextReader.PropertyNameTable
- New feature - Added line information to JsonSerializationException
- New feature - Added JObject.Property overload with a StringComparison
- New feature - Added JsonMergeSettings.PropertyNameComparison
- New feature - Added support for multiple Date constructors with JavaScriptDateTimeConverter
- New feature - Added support for strict equals and strict not equals in JSON Path queries
... (truncated)
Commits
ae9fe44Remove compiler package and update sourcelink (#2498)8ef6621Remove prerelease for 13.0.111331f5Update SDK to 5.0.200 (#2495)c7e8abcUpdate to 13.0.1-beta21745d7cFix JTokenWriter when writing comment to an object (#2493)583eb12Fix missing error when deserializing JToken with a contract type mismatch (#2...b6dc05bChange MaxDepth default to 64 (#2473)15525f1Fix JsonWriter.WriteToken to allow null with string token (#2472)926d2f0Enable embed untracked sources (#2471)0a56633Fixes #2372 - variable typos (#2465)- Additional commits viewable in compare view
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot use these labelswill set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use these reviewerswill set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use these assigneeswill set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language@dependabot use this milestonewill set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.
This PR has 0 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!
Quantification details
Label : No Changes
Size : +0 -0
Percentile : 0%
Total files changed: 0
Change summary by file extension:
Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.
Why proper sizing of changes matters
Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:
- Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
- Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
- Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
- Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.
What can I do to optimize my changes
- Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the
Excludedsection from yourprquantifier.yamlcontext profile. - Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your
prquantifier.yamlcontext profile. - Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your
prquantifier.yamlcontext profile.
- Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
- Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
- Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
How to interpret the change counts in git diff output
- One line was added:
+1 -0 - One line was deleted:
+0 -1 - One line was modified:
+1 -1(git diff doesn't know about modified, it will interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion) - Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification) of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.
Was this comment helpful? :thumbsup: :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email) Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.