AspNetCoreOData
                                
                                
                                
                                    AspNetCoreOData copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        fixes #580
@mirgil please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]Options:
- (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
 @microsoft-github-policy-service agree
- (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
 @microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"Contributor License Agreement
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
I believe the protocol expects these to be lower camel case. If so, changing this would be non-compliant.
Which protocol? Serialization should be done according to the JsonSerializerOptions.PropertyNamingPolicy. If no policy is defined, the original property (name and case) should be used.
I believe the protocol expects these to be lower camel case. If so, changing this would be non-compliant.
@mikepizzo I might be wrong but I think that the PageResultValueConverter is applicable in non-EDM scenarios - I don't think the items, nextpagelink and count property names used currently have anything to do with OData standard. @xuzhg can correct me if I'm wrong. Be that as it may, this PR has no tests to validate the changes.
Thank you @mirgil for you contribution. Could you please add tests to validate the changes?
Please provide a description of the problem and how this fixes it in the pr description.
Could we have some tests for the new functionality ?