project icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
project copied to clipboard

[16.0][ADD] project_scrum

Open adasatorres opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Hi, this addon allow you to manage your project with scrum methodology.

You can access the sprints and blacklog from the project options on kanban view or from the project settings form view.

image

On the backlog view you found the all task for this project, except the task with kanban state is done or task with a sprint assigned.

image

On the sprint view you see the all sprint for this project.

image

  • The sprint's have a timeline view.
  • You can see your task from sprint.
  • When a task have a sprint assigned, only can assigned the members on task.

On Sprint Timeline view you can found the task group by sprint.

image

You can change the sprint state with buttons on sprint form view or using the cron.

Added a new filter on search task for filter using a sprint state.

adasatorres avatar Aug 29 '24 08:08 adasatorres

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

OCA-git-bot avatar Oct 01 '24 09:10 OCA-git-bot

Awesome lets get this merged! @OCA/project-service-maintainers

tarteo avatar Oct 01 '24 09:10 tarteo

Nice work, but it's worth considering that a sprint can sometimes span multiple projects, particularly in contexts where teams manage several projects concurrently or employ scaled agile practices like SAFe. In these cases, linking sprint backlog items to their respective projects can optimize organization and progress tracking across initiatives.

References:

https://scaledagileframework.com/#largesolution https://scaledagileframework.com/safe-scrum/ https://scaledagileframework.com/iteration-planning/

mileo avatar Nov 06 '24 01:11 mileo

@mileo So I think what this technically entails is making project_id on project.sprint a many2many. What do you think @adasatorres? Would this be something you like?

Or we can use project_parent for this?

When the field is empty the sprint can be considered company-wide.

tarteo avatar Nov 15 '24 10:11 tarteo

@adasatorres I made a PR to your branch can you please take a look :) https://github.com/BinhexTeam/project/pull/1

tarteo avatar Nov 15 '24 14:11 tarteo

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

OCA-git-bot avatar Nov 19 '24 08:11 OCA-git-bot

/ocabot merge nobump

pedrobaeza avatar Nov 19 '24 08:11 pedrobaeza

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1329-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot avatar Nov 19 '24 08:11 OCA-git-bot

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 6d8bb29f270698186275accddadadf68f3f0cbb2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

OCA-git-bot avatar Nov 19 '24 08:11 OCA-git-bot

So is this https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/blob/14.0/project_scrum/ officially discontinued now? It's not a good idea to have two modules with the same name in different OCA repositories.

olaf-wagner avatar Nov 22 '24 13:11 olaf-wagner

Oh, I wasn't aware of that one... Maybe we should move this one to there?

pedrobaeza avatar Nov 22 '24 14:11 pedrobaeza

Well, if project-agile is not thought to be superfluous, it would rather belong there. But there is already a module with the same name and different code. So they should either be merged (and ideally a migration provided for existing installations) or one has to be renamed (which should be done anyway in order to avoid confusion and update problems with the older module). There is an open PR for the 16.0 port of the older module: https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/pull/39

olaf-wagner avatar Nov 22 '24 15:11 olaf-wagner

Please, Binhex team, can you check?

pedrobaeza avatar Nov 22 '24 15:11 pedrobaeza

Hello @pedrobaeza, we are using the https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/ also. We are also in the work of adding epics ( https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/issues/41 ) to that line of agile module. These already take care of sprints, user story ( and storypoints concept ) and now will also get epics (all in 14). Then we will migrate all of it in 16, but there is already some work going on for the migration: https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/pull/39 and https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/pull/38 . Have a look @adasatorres. Please keep us informed so we get a uniform agile line of module in 16 OCA. We would like to contribute to the version that will last throughout versions of odoo like https://github.com/OCA/project-agile/ did since 10.

afbenevides avatar Nov 26 '24 04:11 afbenevides

I don't see the advantages of having the scrum modules in a different repository, IMO we should consolidate them and move functionality that is missing here

tarteo avatar Nov 26 '24 09:11 tarteo

Good evening, first of all, I would like to apologize for the commotion caused by this incident. Secondly, the main idea behind this addon was to create a simpler version, as upon reviewing the project_scrum addon in the project_agile repository, I found elements that I don't believe are truly necessary or that, personally, don't make sense to me.

If it is necessary to include this addon in project-agile, is it possible to refactor the project_scrum from that repository?

adasatorres avatar Nov 26 '24 21:11 adasatorres

The discussion here seems to have stalled. Sorry to bother everybody again, but can we somehow address the situation with the same module name? It is rather unfortunate and has caused some confusion and problems in our CI. Currently we must take care to prune the new module from the OCA repos, as some database instances use the old one and the data models are of course not compatible. It's one of a couple of differences we have to manage regarding OCA repositories, and I really would like to reduce these kind of differences. I'm also not sure if this is the right channel to discuss this; perhaps the discussion was continued at some other place?

olaf-wagner avatar Mar 19 '25 12:03 olaf-wagner