Define some key OBO Foundry concepts
| Term | Definition | Distinguish from |
|---|---|---|
| OBO Ontology | Ontology developed in accordance with OBO principles and accepted to be listed in the OBO Ontology Library. Can be serialised in any number of formats, including OWLXML, OBO, JSON and RDFXML. | Ontology in OBO format, Open Biomedical/Biological Ontology |
| OBO Ontology Library | The ontology library located here. | OBO Ontology Registry (term used in README here |
| Ontology in OBO format | An ontology serialised in the OBO format. | OWL Ontology |
| OBO-compliant ontology | An ontology developed in accordance with OBO principles but not accepted to the OBO Ontology Library. | |
| Biological/biomedical ontology | Any ontology in the biological/biomedical domain including open and commercial. | OBO Ontology |
| Open biological/biomedical ontology | Any ontology in the biological/biomedical domain, e.g. most ontologies listed in Bioportal, available under an open license. | OBO Ontology |
| OBO Foundry Ontology | Deprecation candidate: previously referring to an ontology that was reviewed through a specific OBO Foundry review process that has not been applied for a few years. | OBO Ontology (parent term) |
Hierarchy (adapted from @lubianat proposal)
- Ontology
- Ontology by serialisation
- Ontology in OBO format (although we have argued many times in the past that OBO is, in essence, a syntax of a subset of OWL)
- OWL ontology
- Medical/Biomedical/Biological Ontology
- Open Medical/Biomedical/Biological Ontology
- OBO-compliant Ontology
- OBO Ontology
- OBO Foundry Ontology (marked for obsoletion)
- OBO Ontology
- OBO-compliant Ontology
- Open Medical/Biomedical/Biological Ontology
- Ontology by serialisation
Nice, @matentzn , looks great!
I hope it is not pedantic, but maybe in the definition of "Open biological/biomedical ontology" could there be something saying that it is "openly available" or "available for general use" or "available under an open license" to clarify what "open" means in the context? Or maybe just adding "open" would be good enough, perhaps?
Yeah adjusted that text! Good point.
This ticket could be tagged with a governance tag, as an example of one that needs community decision-making.
Made a governance label and tagged!
see also #148
see also new issue #2199