Open Community (TDC) Meeting, Thursday 09 May 2024
Weekly meetings happen on Thursdays at 9am - 10am Pacific
This agenda gives visibility into discussion topics for the weekly Technical Developer Community (TDC) meetings. Sharing agenda items in advance allows people to plan to attend meetings where they have an interest in specific topics.
Whether attending or not, anyone can comment on this issue prior to the meeting to suggest topics or to add comments on planned topics or proposals.
Meetings take place over Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/975841675, dial-in passcode: 763054
Accessibility & Etiquette
-
Participants must abide by our Code-of-Conduct.
-
Meetings are recorded for future reference, and for those who are not able to attend in-person.
-
We invite you to feel comfortable to challenge any language or behaviour that is harmful or not inclusive during this meeting.
-
We look forward to your participation, but please consider these acts of etiquette:
- Remain on mute when not speaking to prevent interruptions.
- Blur your background to reduce visual distractions.
- Use the Zoom meeting "Raise Hand" feature to notify the group when you wish to speak.
| Blur My Background | Raise Hand |
|---|---|
Agenda Structure
| Topic | Owner | Decision/NextStep |
|---|---|---|
| Intros and governance meta-topics (5 mins) | TDC | |
| Reports from Special Interest Groups (5 mins) | SIG members | |
| Any other business (add comments below to suggest topics) | TDC | |
| Approved spec PRs | @OAI/tsc | |
| Active Projects | @OAI/openapi-maintainers | |
| New issues needing attention | @OAI/triage |
/cc @OAI/tsc please suggest items for inclusion.
- OASComply-related PRs and issues
- #3779 (undefined/implementation-defined, impacts compliance goals)
- #3772 (3.0.4 guidance on
$ref, needs approvals from folks who understand the 2.0/3.0 behavior in question; I don't really like my own wording on this one) - #3758 (3.1.1 guidance on document parsing, needs 4 or 5 approvals due to the impact, even if technically a clarification)
- #3760 (quick Param Obj clarification, I'm not entirely sure I have it right, needs approval from someone who knows the history)
- #3792 (I have no idea how to test compliance of this)
- Oldest non-draft, non-branch-porting PRs still needing approval:
- #3714 (generics pattern in Schema object, @ralfhandl has approved)
- #3749 (schema fix for
operationRefURI-ness, @ralfhandl has approved) - beyond this, please prioritize approving ports of already-approved PRs to other branches
-
reviewissues:- #1502 (solves numerous other issues, including another
reviewissue that's gotten bogged down in debate) -
other
reviewissues
- #1502 (solves numerous other issues, including another
Adding to Agenda: #3774