Arne Christian Beer

I took some time to properly think about this. The idea to have a token pool for each group and having each task consume an arbitrary amount of those tokens...

Maybe, we could introduce `tokens` as an subcommand alias for now! This would make the transition phase a lot nicer. We could then deprecate the old `parallel` command and flags...

A few other things that need to be considered: - We also have to do checks when changing the token size of a group. Otherwise there might be tasks in...

After careful consideration, this doesn't fit into the scope of Pueue. Pueue is still designed to be a convenience tool for server operators. A handy cli tool for day-to-day use....

To be honest, I didn't write the fuzzy integration and I'm not even using it (yet) :D This was a contribution by @nothingnesses so he's probably most qualitified to review...

If @nothingnesses isn't available, I'll try to go through both solutions soon :) We're currently having some great weather in Germany, so this might take a bit of time ;D...

I like it! It has colors, better readability and the code is significantly shorter/easier to understand :). It feels pretty polished. The only thing I stumbled upon is that one...

Don't worry :D I just walked through my projects and did a bit of project management, so I have a better overview of what needs to be done ;)

Awesome! Thanks for your contribution :) I'll probably go ahead and integrate this into my workflow as well. It looks much more polished than the old wrapper :)

This is most definitely because running pueued as a service in Windows environments hasn't been supported/thought off yet! As I'm only owning a Linux machine, I rely on the community...