Ablation study on the MOT17 validation set

[FTanghu]

Hello, in the ablation experiment part of the paper, MOTA can reach 77.66 of your reproduced ByteTrack (Baseline), while the official ByteTrack Only 76.6 is in the same validation set. When I use tracking threshold of 0.6, new track threshold of 0.7 and, first association matching threshold of 0.8 pointed out in your paper ， the official byteTrack can only reach 76.2. Can you tell me how to get ByteTrack (Baseline) results in the ablation experiment part of your paper.

[NirAharon]

Hello, The difference is that ByteTrack calculated the MOTA within their code while I used TrackEval for evaluation - refer to TrackEval/issues#75.

[gyh420]

Hello, in the ablation experiment part of the paper, MOTA can reach 77.66 of your reproduced ByteTrack (Baseline), while the official ByteTrack Only 76.6 is in the same validation set. When I use tracking threshold of 0.6, new track threshold of 0.7 and, first association matching threshold of 0.8 pointed out in your paper ， the official byteTrack can only reach 76.2. Can you tell me how to get ByteTrack (Baseline) results in the ablation experiment part of your paper.

Hello, in the ablation experiment part of the paper, MOTA can reach 77.66 of your reproduced ByteTrack (Baseline), while the official ByteTrack Only 76.6 is in the same validation set. When I use tracking threshold of 0.6, new track threshold of 0.7 and, first association matching threshold of 0.8 pointed out in your paper ， the official byteTrack can only reach 76.2. Can you tell me how to get ByteTrack (Baseline) results in the ablation experiment part of your paper. hoew you get the result like 77.66?