Nikolay Pianikov

But still, if you would suggest what an API might look like, which, in your opinion, solves problems, you will share, and I (or we together) will try to add...

Thanks for the really great research. As for _DependsOn_ - in fact, this method just copies the set of bindings from one composer to another as is. It doesn't take...

As for _ResolveToExternal_ - good idea and I was thinking something similar :) My method looked like _Arg(string name = "")_. _name_ is required, for example, when there are multiple...

In this case all resolve methods will have this set of arguments

I'm not sure I understand the idea: >The next thing is a different take on the same thing. If it was possible to make the generated resolve methods private, then...

Regarding to `Make it possible to resolve multiple types without introducing a composition root` yes I think it is good idea to create a new ticket and we will continue...

I wanted to emphasize that _Pure.DI_ is not a DI container, it is a code generator that creates code as if we were writing it without containers, but followed the...

@johnjuuljensen I've create the issue #14 about access modifiers

#15 is about multiple types

Please try [1.1.54](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Pure.DI/1.1.54), the sample is [here](https://github.com/DevTeam/Pure.DI#resolution-arguments).