Nigel-Ecma

@jskeet wrote: > I suspect we really want to describe it in terms of "implicitly or explicitly `this`", i.e. in terms of the qualification of the field. I wouldn't be...

@BillWagner – I made some changes in PR #1195 thinking this PR was already merged, oops. I've removed them from 1195 but cannot make direct suggestions here as the changes...

This is a leftover over from wiping the *null type*. Back in v1 §9.4.4.6 defined the *null-literal* to have the null type, and §13.1.4 (now §10.2.8) said “From the null...

> Okay, so just to check, is the ball now in @Nigel-Ecma's court to validate the grammar and update the validator? @jskeet – Essentially yes, my [earlier comment](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/1237#pullrequestreview-2504288404) provides details.

This PR is subsumed by *Grammar – Consistency & Cleanup 5* #1322. If #1322 is approved this PR should be closed.

I can see why ISO would be wary, a Standard should not link to a source which might change. Furthermore the Standard may gain a far larger API surface than...

I tried to get the first type into the Internet Archive – it works fine apart from MS inserting a locale, with two attempts I ended up with `en-nz` and...

@BillWagner – feel free to write a script if you wish :-) You can force a page into the internet archive using a URL, see the end of bullet 3...

I suggested using the IA rather than direct links in the original suggestion to avoid stale links – this is what Wikipedia does, I think they have a bot that...

I’d support that, it would be good not to lose the information. I’ll leave others to be inventive with the name if the consensus agrees with the idea. > On...