Nick Crews
Nick Crews
ahh, that is for abstract structural equality. I am looking for the actual bound data to be the same. Updated my original post to be more clear.
Ok, that's fine with me if we don't support naming tables. Any thoughts on - should we autogenerate a name for all tables? Or - should we move the get_name()...
That seems like a good idea for now. Can add a workaround back in later.
I split out the test refactoring into #11315, maybe we merge that and then I revade this to only include the behavior changes
@cpcloud This is now a lot simpler now that the test refactor is merged separately, and hopefully should be a quick review.
@mark-druffel @RohanTemgire please comment on that linked PR, neither me nor Phillip know much about pyspark
I think this is related to https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/13501?
That would work. Also, that PR is turning into a bit of a doozy, if you wanted to help out there it would be appreciated!
#9473 needs to be resolved for the array changes (which really is getting stalled by larger philosophical decisions that this PR is exposing), and then the linked map PR can...
I've been looking around for alternatives, haven't found any yet. I'm currently experimenting with training a custom spaCy NER model using the training data from this repo. You can see...