Alexander Neumann
Alexander Neumann
> I don't understand why this is important vs. vcpkg_find_acquire_program I thought you wanted to get rid of `vcpkg_find_acquire_program`? Also `vcpkg_find_acquire_program` does not support versioning. So you are stuck with...
@strega-nil-ms: Results? I need this to push out the usage of `yasm`.
> I think we want to answer what this means with respect to artifacts. Artifacts are the tool we really want to solve this problem but they're nowhere near stable...
@BillyONeal I cannot really read a plan of action out of your statement. > This means that they may not be version constrained, aren't intended to participate in the ABI...
@BillyONeal So I moved the whole tool stuff into `vcpkg-port-config` and let it make a `find_program` call. If it finds nothing it tries to acquire it. So feel free to...
@BillyONeal So can we move on with this approach here? I basically changed it to act like `vcpkg_find_acquire_program`. I have like 3-4 other ports waiting for this tool to be...
@BillyONeal should I directly undraft?
> Never filter out CPPFLAGS out of CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS This might not lead to errors know but will in the future since the preprocessor run will have the wrong...
That has already been debugged..... vcpkg needs a save way to add a path to PATH without modifying existing program search paths. What you are overserving is that NINJA is...
`VCPKG_OVERRIDE_FIND_PACKAGE_NAME` is broken. Don't use it. Without `cmake_language(CALL)` the correct behavior was never implementable.