Alex

Closing as this should be fixed with #304

Thank you all for the discussion. I have taken some time to think about this as it seems quite difficult and here are my thoughts. At first I was split...

Sorry for the late reply, I have been very busy the last few weeks. I agree, targeting a single account is absolutely not feasible. My scenario that I fear is...

Hi, imo this is a really cool idea! NetExec already has a smbserver integration, although as far as i know it has never been used before :D Maybe this could...

Adding to this, @Adamkadaban shared a standalone project based on this idea on the discord: https://github.com/Adamkadaban/NTLMCrack

Closing as this has been fixed in #279

This is indeed intended behaviour! @Marshall-Hallenbeck not sure if we want to change that. That could lead to unexpected side effects. If we want to we should test that thoroughly

Yes and I think there was a reason for it, give me a bit time to think it through.

The problem is it is undefined which user we would use. Use the first one? Than you could just not use --continue-on-success Use the one with Pwned? That could potentially...

Although as i am looking at the code the second `if not self.args.continue_on_success:` is duplicate and could be removed.