NeTEx
NeTEx copied to clipboard
NeTEx-CEN
NeTEx is a CEN Technical Standard for exchanging Public Transport schedules and related data.
Evaluate if we actually want this: ``` Dummy Type for a TIMEBAND. Name of TIMEBAND. Elements for a TIMEBAND. Type for a TIMEBAND. Name of TIMEBAND. Elements for a TIMEBAND....
According to Time Demand Times physical model in NeTEx specification TimeDemandType contains turnaroundTimes. XSD TimeDemandTypeTimingsGroup seems to have runTimes, waitTimes, layovers, headways, and vehiclePreferences, but turnaroundTimes is missing.
I'm looking at `TicketingEquipment` for counters we have this ``` true 1.5 ``` for ticket machines we have for example this ``` 1.3 ``` so again, we are not very...
This is not an issue per se, but from a consistency point of view something we may want to avoid. ``` AccessNumber: - xsd:integer - xsd:positiveInteger AccountingCode: - PrivateCodeStructure -...
What is the reason that GenericPathJunction_VersionStructure inherits from Point_VersionStructure, but its reference takes a route over PlaceRef. **DeckPathJunction:** ['DeckPathJunction_InlineType', 'DeckPathJunction_VersionStructure', '**GenericPathJunction_VersionStructure**', '**Point_VersionStructure**', 'DataManagedObjectStructure', 'EntityInVersionStructure', 'EntityStructure'] **DeckPathJunctionRef:** ['**GenericPathJunctionRefStructure**', '**PlaceRefStructure**', 'GroupOfEntitiesRefStructure', 'GroupOfEntitiesRefStructure_Dummy',...
https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/blob/next/xsd/netex_part_3/part3_salesTransactions/netex_salesContract_version.xsd#L441 Since nothing is derived from "FareContractEntry" (instead from FareContractEntry_) check if it is correct that this is an abstract type and should even exist.
As requested by @thbar script and executed code to compare. This code checks NeTEx_publication.xsd for selectors (xpath) that do not exist in the XML Schema at all. This is hygiene.
I noticed that `EquipmentRef` can be assigned to `WheelchairVehicleEquipment` and `AccessVehicleEquipment`. This seemed wrong to me. My guess is that the `ActualVehicleEquipmentGroup` shouldn't be part of them. Currently things like...
* Fixing the duplication in ServiceBookingArrangement. * Extension for some standard limitations (age, limitation in parallel to existing public transport according to the Basecamp discussion: https://3.basecamp.com/3256016/buckets/2570434/messages/8778284879 On Nicks entries I...
