NeTEx-CEN
All changes from Nick
The ENTRANCE TYPE SHould be abstract - use concrte subtype STOP PLACE ENTRANCE etc
#892 #891 https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/pull/888 Access conditions for passenger vehicles onboard Tmlign Add max poer to parking #887 Access conditions for passenger vehicles onboard TM ALignment DECK PLANS Add type of deck entrance usage to DECK ENTRANCE USAGE #886 Add max power to parking https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/pull/885 Fix correct powered train & unpowered train https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/pull/884 add SPOT ALLOCATIOn elements and update examples https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/pull/881 Fixing an enum https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/pull/880 Add FarePrice Frame
Given the very detailed modelling including the definition of wheelchair types, I had a look at the AccessibilityAssessment. In Deck-Plans-Example_trains.xml I found WheelchairAccess == true together with StepFreeAccess == false. This is an invalid combination - according to the definition in EPIAP wheelchair access has step-free access as precondition.
@nick-knowles What kind of wheelchair access should be modelled? Everything step-free such that it would suffice to change StepFreeAccess to true? Or the more complicated case that only accompanied wheelchair is possible or assistance is available to overcome steps?
@skinkie pls make sure that it is mergable again. I think this comes from your latest merge
I know. That's why I would have prefered to merge this one first. Yours was partially automatised, so I hoped it would be easier to update.
Make sure that all files validate. Changes were made to files that were not checked in xmllint.
@skinkie thanks for the adaptions. I fixed something from validating the whole example folder in xml spy. Should be good to go now.
hmm still full of problems... https://github.com/nick-knowles/NeTEx/actions/runs/14870614418/job/41757999865