NeTEx
NeTEx copied to clipboard
Feature duty daytype
Replaces #418
The VDV example fails because the introduced StartPoints and EndPoints do not exist in the file. Should be resolved first.
@nick-knowles mentions several times this is a draft. Some things must be resolved first.
Typo reviews gracefully accepted. If someone feels like fixing the VDV example would be there thing, please do so.
@skinkie why did you add this to version 3.0? Not to 2.0?
@trurlurl can you do a deep dive into the structure?
@skinkie why did you add this to version 3.0? Not to 2.0?
Because it was #418 was also 3.0.
Note that Duty stuff is "advisory" and not part of the formal NeTEx standard - we added an unofficial XML implementation mainly to clarify the old TM conceptual model which had never been systematically modularised for implementation.
This is the current UML for DUTY STRECH - Was the error in the implementiontion XML rathe r han the UML?