Tim Steinbach

3.10.107

1

Any chance I could get you to update to 3.10.107? :)

[pureconfig] Refined keys for Map[String, T]

3

PureConfig provides an instance of `ConfigReader` for maps. (see https://github.com/pureconfig/pureconfig/blob/v0.9.0/core/src/main/scala/pureconfig/DerivedReaders.scala#L198) Unfortunately, it seems impossible to provide a refinement for the map key without writing a custom `ConfigReader` I think `refined`...

Email refinement

3

It would be wonderful if we had a string refinement that validates an email address :)

Boolean refinements "weak"

9

The title sucks, I know :) The following is an annoying thing `refined` allows but should probably not be allowed. I also think that some kind of type bound or...

Compose refinements

1

I have a (seemingly) unusual use-case with refined: I would like to define a combination of refinements. Here is a simple example: ```scala import eu.timepit.refined.predicates.all._ type Hostname = NonEmptyString type...

Document "types" module in README

1

Just stumbled upon `eu.timepit.refined.types.all`. Let's add something about this package to the README :)

eventually + assertMatch

3

Using a combination of `eventually` and `assertMatch` is currently rather inconvenient. `assertMatch` returns `Unit` while eventually expects `Boolean`. So the following piece of code does not compile ```scala eventually {...

ZIO Shield will react to `// scalafix:ok` comments via Scalafix. This leads to a ton of these warnings due to a project's use of "regular" Scalafix rules. ``` > sbt...

Are the annotations not supposed to mark code as "Don't worry, Shield"? I have this code ```scala import Scalaz._ implicit class MatcherOps[A: Equal](lhs: A) { @impure def (rhs: A): Unit...

I just ran into something I could not figure out. Using 0.14.0 of deriving published under `com.fommil`, the following code works fine. With 1.0 under `org.scalaz` it throws an error....