Philip Gichuhi

Hi @RikvanderLinde, thank you for your feedback and glad that you found a workaround. To try and reduce the size of the generated library, we are generating a slightly limited...

Hi @praducg, this seems to be a casing issue being validated by the API, `client-request-id` works on Graph Explorer. It should also work with this SDK. Please let me know...

Hi @Geiste, are you referencing an IcM incident number? I'm unable to find one with that number. Please share a link. Unfortunately we are currently only doing security patches for...

Apologies for the gaps in the docs to use the `graph-core` v1.0 package on its own. This will be considered for future sprints. You may consider transitioning to using `msgraph-sdk`...

@a0z0 Thank you for reporting this and sharing a workaround. I have escalated this to the API team to update their API schema since the SDK's models are generated based...

Internal [IcM](https://portal.microsofticm.com/imp/v5/incidents/details/585304570)

@jbh999 the .NET issue has been referenced as well. The fix should cascade across all languages.

@daverdalas when using the assertion to initialize the GraphServiceClient, you can add the `.offline_access` scope. After making a successful request, the Graph access token is cached. There are samples on...

Hi @dogrileycom, thanks for reaching out. This happens because we're initialising a [`User`](https://github.com/microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-python/blob/main/msgraph/generated/models/user.py) object whose properties default to `None`. The HTTP response only returns the selected fields. Would you mind...

Thanks for reporting this @ihudedi. Would you mind sharing the result of some checks here? This will help with debugging. This will validate that the number of bytes uploaded is...