Nathan Xu

> As is right now, if it's marked dirty and there are no database changes the cache will be updated and the database will not. Unfortunately, there is not a...

Thanks. Makes sense. On Fri., May 20, 2022, 10:55 a.m. deAtog, ***@***.***> wrote: > I reviewed the above regression. I think we both agree that some mechanism > is need...

> I reviewed the above regression. I think we both agree that some mechanism is need to differentiate the whether the one-to-one is dirty from a caching perspective vs a...

I found a good testing case and updated. When the OneToOne owner side update its association, the `mappedBy` side should not be marked as "dirty" ending up with issuing an...

> As I stated previously, the test cases I added during my initial PR did not test the dirtiness of the OneToOneType. I do not believe the changes you've made...

> As I stated previously, the test cases I added during my initial PR did not test the dirtiness of the OneToOneType. I do not believe the changes you've made...

seems great idea for optimization. not sure whether there is some unanticipated side effect (which we usually are aware of only after it has been released), though.

TBH, I am not sure，:). I am not familiar with action queue related stuff. Maybe Beikov knows much better than me. On Mon., Sep. 28, 2020, 21:20 Yanming Zhou, wrote:...

BTW, I would highly recommend considering targeting this feature to v6 (`wip/v6.0`) for v6 is a natural testbed for such new features and @sebersole might provide invaluable feedback on the...

> > BTW, I would highly recommend considering targeting this feature to v6 (`wip/v6.0`) for v6 is a natural testbed for such new features and @sebersole might provide invaluable feedback...