nanovna-saver icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
nanovna-saver copied to clipboard

logarithmic scaling of graphs

Open UlrichD61 opened this issue 5 years ago • 9 comments

Hello, me again.

After quite successfully using NanoVNA for impedance measurement of EMC components I'm asking if it's possible to add an option for the graphs to display in logarithmic scaling. Ideally selectable for amplitude and/or frequency. That logarithmic scaling is the industry standard when looking into datasheets and having same scaling in nanovna-saver would be very helpful.

just a thought.....

Here an example of a ferrite-core in logarithmic scaling. grafik

UlrichD61 avatar Oct 07 '19 17:10 UlrichD61

I had log scaling of frequency on the list, but I had not yet considered log scaling of impedance as well. Interesting point. I will put it on the wishlist :-)

mihtjel avatar Oct 08 '19 07:10 mihtjel

Thanks, you are a star !!

Ulrich

⁣TypeApp for Android herunterladen ​

Am 8. Okt. 2019, 09:01, um 09:01, mihtjel [email protected] schrieb:

I had log scaling of frequency on the list, but I had not yet considered log scaling of impedance as well. Interesting point. I will put it on the wishlist :-)

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/issues/33#issuecomment-539371067

UlrichD61 avatar Oct 08 '19 07:10 UlrichD61

Log scaling of the frequency axis is in for 0.1.3.

Log scaling of the data axis: Which charts would it be relevant for? I'm thinking only Q and R+jX make sense?

mihtjel avatar Oct 13 '19 16:10 mihtjel

Hello Yes I think so too.

Most other graphs are in dezibel, that is already logarithmic scaling.

Cheers & Thanks for all effort into that!

Ulrich

⁣TypeApp for Android herunterladen ​

Am 13. Okt. 2019, 18:01, um 18:01, mihtjel [email protected] schrieb:

Log scaling of the frequency axis is in for 0.1.3.

Log scaling of the data axis: Which charts would it be relevant for? I'm thinking only Q and R+jX make sense?

-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/issues/33#issuecomment-541431159

UlrichD61 avatar Oct 13 '19 19:10 UlrichD61

Hello mihtjel, once more a lot of thanks for all effort on Saver 1.5. I'm sure the whole community is extremely greatful.

Regarding the logarithmic scaling of frequency, is there any chance to devide the screen into "decades" rather than equidistance scaling with odd numbers ? Having the classic way of showing decades e.g. lines at 1 MHz, 10 MHz, 100 MHz..... (or even fractions ) would make it more useful and compatible to the standard.

Just a thought :-)

UlrichD61 avatar Nov 08 '19 08:11 UlrichD61

Hello Ulrich, it's certainly on the TODO list, but I still need to figure out a good way to do it :-)

mihtjel avatar Nov 08 '19 08:11 mihtjel

Hello, me again. Just two more enhencement ideas:

It is great to have the S11 |Z| available in the chart-selection. Would it be a problem to add S11 |Z| also into the "Marker Settings" to the have the actual impedance as number ?

Additionally a little "Text-Window" in the graph image would be ideal to allow commenting the image before saving.

Thanks !

PS: ...... the decade-devided logartithmic frequency scaling is still on my Christmas wish list :-). See post from Nov. 8th. Unfortunately I'm not a SW programmer to support any of the topics with some coding.

UlrichD61 avatar Nov 30 '19 11:11 UlrichD61

sorrry, closed by accident and reopenened again

UlrichD61 avatar Nov 30 '19 13:11 UlrichD61

#377 should fix the logarithmic plotting party of this

rjordans avatar Feb 27 '21 22:02 rjordans

There hasn't been any activity on this issue recently, and in order to prioritize active issues, it will be marked as stale. Please make sure to update to the latest version and check if that solves the issue. Let us know if that works for you by leaving a 👍 Because this issue is marked as stale, it will be closed and locked in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 11 '22 08:11 github-actions[bot]

Arguably, this is different from what the OP has been asking for. The point of having industry-standard graphs is to be able to make quick visual comparisons.

These two charts show the same data, but they look completely different.

image

ignore absolute numbers, focus on the shape of curves

output

When one compares their own local measurements with manufacturer's image

lack of proper log scale is very visible

ikatkov avatar Mar 22 '23 19:03 ikatkov