2017
2017 copied to clipboard
NaNoGenMo
NaNoGenMo/Creative NLP Slack channel?
Is there a Slack group or something similar for creative NLP? I'm in the middle of my first big NLP project, and it would be really great to have experienced people to sound ideas off/complain to.
I'll also accept a Twitter hashtag that people respond to.
If people are interested, but this doesn't exist yet, I'm happy to make it.
The botally slack (https://botally.slack.com/) overlaps with nanogenmo people quite a bit, and some people there do language processing as part of their projects, although the focus is on short-form generation (tweet-length).
There's a generative art slack (https://botally.slack.com/) is similar, but with less of a focus on tweet-length material. It's pretty dead, though.
Botwiki's slack actually has more NLP because it's focused on interactive stuff, but botwiki in general is pretty heavily focused on business stuff rather than art stuff so the creative angle is less foregrounded.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:47 PM Travis [email protected] wrote:
Is there a Slack group or something similar for creative NLP? I'm in the middle of my first big NLP project, and it would be really great to have experienced people to sound ideas off/complain to.
I'll also accept a Twitter hashtag that people respond to.
If people are interested, but this doesn't exist yet, I'm happy to make it.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NaNoGenMo/2017/issues/134, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAd6GdV4V9IVHlbu8eGqP0XfWP2-KP7Yks5tlnTGgaJpZM4TJDWF .
Sorry, the genart slack is at https://generativeart.slack.com
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018, 9:19 AM John Ohno [email protected] wrote:
The botally slack (https://botally.slack.com/) overlaps with nanogenmo people quite a bit, and some people there do language processing as part of their projects, although the focus is on short-form generation (tweet-length).
There's a generative art slack (https://botally.slack.com/) is similar, but with less of a focus on tweet-length material. It's pretty dead, though.
Botwiki's slack actually has more NLP because it's focused on interactive stuff, but botwiki in general is pretty heavily focused on business stuff rather than art stuff so the creative angle is less foregrounded.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:47 PM Travis [email protected] wrote:
Is there a Slack group or something similar for creative NLP? I'm in the middle of my first big NLP project, and it would be really great to have experienced people to sound ideas off/complain to.
I'll also accept a Twitter hashtag that people respond to.
If people are interested, but this doesn't exist yet, I'm happy to make it.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NaNoGenMo/2017/issues/134, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAd6GdV4V9IVHlbu8eGqP0XfWP2-KP7Yks5tlnTGgaJpZM4TJDWF .
There's a generative art slack ... but with less of a focus on tweet-length material. It's pretty dead, though.
I'm kinda curious why that is. Is it just because programmers tend to prefer "#botally" and it's all network effects? Or is it due to short-form text generation being much easier to do (and thus more innovation and creativity in that line) while other forms of generation (long-form text generation or other forms of computer-generated artworks) are more difficult to pull off (which means there's not really much to talk about)? I haven't really talked in that slack chat because I don't really have much to talk about...and if everyone in that chat feels the same way, then, obviously, that can lead to a dead chatroom.
Is it a good idea to try to revive the "generative art" slack chat? Or should we just bury the corpse?
I think it's just network effect. Everybody who is in the genart slack is also in the botally slack, so it feels redundant in many cases, & the stuff the genart slack covers that botally doesn't (like longer-form music generation) isn't terribly popular.
As for killing it, it's up to Michael what he wants to do with it.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:31 PM Tariq Ali [email protected] wrote:
There's a generative art slack ... but
with less of a focus on tweet-length material. It's pretty dead, though.
I'm kinda curious why that is. Is it just because programmers tend to prefer "#botally" and it's all network effects? Or is it due to short-form text generation being much easier to do (and thus more innovation and creativity in that line) while other forms of generation (long-form text generation or other forms of computer-generated artworks) are more difficult to pull off (which means there's not really much to talk about)?
Is it a good idea to try to revive the "generative art" slack chat? Or should we just bury the corpse?
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NaNoGenMo/2017/issues/134#issuecomment-383350523, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAd6GcN6pRQ8Hf4mnLLZlvJQAoX3zz5Kks5tq-t8gaJpZM4TJDWF .
