cutlass
cutlass copied to clipboard
[QST] Are there plans to add specialisations for Sm90?
What is your question?
I recently tried to change the type tags on the DGEMM examples to cutlass::arch::Sm90
, which caused a load of compile errors. This is primarily because there's certain template specialisations missing for Sm90
, e.g there's no specialisation like this.
Is this something that's on the plans to be added / are PRs welcome?
the link points to dual gemm example not dgemm. do you want dual gemm or dgemm?
Ah sorry, laxness on my part. I meant dual GEMM.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, 15:58 Haicheng Wu, @.***> wrote:
the link points to dual gemm example not dgemm. do you want dual gemm or dgemm?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NVIDIA/cutlass/issues/1123#issuecomment-1747028826, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7CASFCIQHJBUBAE42GUETX5V2SPAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5SXO35GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONBXGAZDQOBSGY . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
@danthe3rd
you should be able to still run this example on h100 without changing the source code. just use sm90 in nvcc/cmake command line.
this example does not use new features of hopper. we are looking to write a hopper dedicated version using cutlass 3.x
Note: we with @joerowell and others are working on a diverged hard fork of xformers that has little to do with the mainstream :wink: We are rewriting the orignal kernels, doing a lot of optimizations, fixing bugs, etc.
@joerowell optimizations for dual GEMM are on our roadmap for H1'24.
This issue has been labeled inactive-30d
due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d
if there is no activity in the next 60 days.
This issue has been labeled inactive-90d
due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.