Nathan Daly

Thanks for the explanation, @tanmaykm! :) Makes sense. Okay, I think we should be able to achieve those goals without having dictionaries in the structs. The proto implementations in other...

> would the maintainer that triggered `@JuliaReleaseVote` pass in the intended bump , i.e. `@JuliaReleaseVote register patch` or `@JuliaReleaseVote register("patch")` or something like that? +1 to this question.

(This came up when trying to add Arrow to our RelationalAI system, for serializing our results to Arrow in our client/server protocol. We're excited about it! 😁 Thanks for the...

I'm reading up on the thread where this `@scopedenum` macro comes from: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/encapsulating-enum-access-via-dot-syntax/11785/10 Interesting solution to that problem! :) It looks like @vtjnash identified exactly the same comment that we...

Might make sense to extract scopedenum to a package if you're using it in a few different packages now?

It seems to me that since this macro is only used internally inside the package, and isn't meant to be exposed to users, would it be fine to rewrite this...

> Arguably this should be fixed in Jupyter itself — if it can't find the Foo x.y kernel, shouldn't it automatically use Foo x.z for z > y? I think...

> I think it currently does do this, but for different language_info.versions, not for the kernel name. Hmm, so after some further exploration, I believe that no, Jupyter doesn't implement...

> I see the point about automated tests in #852, however. Hmm, so since this approach isn't a good one (per your points about minor releases being _forward compatible_ but...

After the latest commit i've just pushed, we can now create a kernel that will accept changes to the minor version: ```julia IJulia.installkernel("julia-ci", specversion="$(VERSION.major)") ``` or that will accept any...