[WIP] Adventures in the amazing world of specification of dependencies and predictiveness

[nulltoken]

Pull request description

@linkdotnet Early work in the land of #108

Not a real PR as of now, rather a test bed for expectations (and tests that we'd like to see passing).

PR meta checklist

• [ ] Pull request is targeted at main branch for code
• [ ] Pull request is linked to all related issues, if any.

Code PR specific checklist

• [ ] My code follows the code style of this project and AspNetCore coding guidelines.
• [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [ ] I have updated the appropriate sub section in the CHANGELOG.md.
• [ ] I have added, updated or removed tests to according to my changes.
  • [ ] All tests passed.

[nulltoken]

@linkdotnet Not all tests are passing.

Before going further with how the code should be changed to make them pass, I'd like some feedback from you about the following points:

• Do the new added tests make sense?
• What are new scenarios that we'd like to add?

Note: I haven't wandered in the region of dynamic jobs. Yet. Before diving into that, I'd like to ensure "how the lib should behave with 'simpler' jobs" is defined.

[linkdotnet]

I will have a look at this at the end of the week - unfortunately I am a bit swamped with stuff.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 69.56522% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...CronJob/Configuration/Builder/DependencyBuilder.cs	41.66%	5 Missing and 2 partials :warning:

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/NCronJob/Registry/JobRegistry.cs	96.15% <100.00%> (+0.27%)	:arrow_up:
...CronJob/Configuration/Builder/DependencyBuilder.cs	65.00% <41.66%> (-35.00%)	:arrow_down:

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes