As a user, I want to includes aliases in context product name validation

[jordanpadams]

Checked for duplicates

No - I haven't checked

🧑‍🔬 User Persona(s)

Node Operator

💪 Motivation

...so that I can allow for other known aliases for a context object to be used in a label

📖 Additional Details

Per #945 (bug closed in lieu of this new requirement): I was running some m20 validations for testing, with the latest validate (3.5.1) and there is a new warning type, warning.label.context_ref_mismatch, which is problematic.

The warnings look like this:

        {
          "severity": "WARNING",
          "type": "warning.label.context_ref_mismatch",
          "line": 64,
          "message": "Context reference name mismatch. Value: 'Mars2020' Expected one of: '[MARS 2020]'"
        },
        {
          "severity": "WARNING",
          "type": "warning.label.context_ref_mismatch",
          "line": 74,
          "message": "Context reference name mismatch. Value: 'Mars 2020' Expected one of: '[Perseverance]'"
        },
        {
          "severity": "WARNING",
          "type": "warning.label.context_ref_mismatch",
          "line": 83,
          "message": "Context reference name mismatch. Value: 'Cache Camera' Expected one of: '[ENGINEERING CAMERA SUITE (ECAM)]'"
        }

Now, we have a problem because for m20 ecam, we specifically use the "instrument:mars2020.ecam" context product, which covers a whole bunch of individual cameras, and then use under Observing_System_Component to say exactly which camera it is.

Acceptance Criteria

Given When I perform Then I expect

⚙️ Engineering Details

See #945 for additional context

🎉 I&T

No response