Markus Lobedann

IMHO this should still be merged

IMHO this should still be merged

> > In ERPNext some calls to it can be found where refresh_fields() is implicitely called afterwards. I guess to circumvent this problem. > > @Mutantpenguin could you also send...

IMHO this should still be merged

What can I do to get this accepted? If it's a unittest, please point me to an existing one I can adjust/copy. I am thinking about adding another custom field...

IMHO this should still be merged

> > Setting of properties without a setter (in case of virtual fields) just doesn't work and makes no sense anyway. > > Could you elaborate on what's the issue...