MuntashirAkon
Unfrozen apps filter
Please check before submitting an issue
- [X] I am using the latest version of App Manager
- [X] I have searched the issues and haven't found anything relevant
- [X] I have read the docs
Describe a description of the new feature
Filter option to show only NOT frozen app.
Describe the solution you'd like
When you activate the unfrozen apps filter, only non-frozen apps will be shown.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
Since the first versions of this wonderful app, I have felt false about this filter. And for people like me, who have many frozen apps, perform actions where we only need to select NOT frozen becomes tortuous and complex
It would be nice to have a selectable option (like how reverse sort is) to disclude rather than include the selected filter. Obviously, there'd be some redundancies since "not user apps" would mean "system apps" and "not system" would mean "user apps," but for other options, this would allow even more filter control.
It would be nice to have a selectable option (like how reverse sort is) to disclude rather than include the selected filter. Obviously, there'd be some redundancies since "not user apps" would mean "system apps" and "not system" would mean "user apps," but for other options, this would allow even more filter control.
I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)
I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)
I don't know if adding additional steps to do the same thing we do currently is the best way to go. Selecting filters by visible labels is so fluid and simple.
I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)
I don't know if adding additional steps to do the same thing we do currently is the best way to go. Selecting filters by visible labels is so fluid and simple.
There will always be presets. Adding flexibility allows users to import/export/share/customize presets which is more useful than the current mechanism. Also, inverse filtering would only make sense under such circumstances.