janusch

Awesome! But it should not run oom. There is a vram intense part which is not optimally implemented. I can't fix it before next Sunday. But if someone wants to...

It amazes me that abs grad improves the results by 0.4 - 0.5 dB @ichsan2895. That's absolutely freaking crazy. It means also that this implementation easily destroys the leading methods...

There is currently a VRAM issue I need to resolve. It should be much less memory-hungry. But that won't impact the overrall structure of this pr. The parameterization is different,...

The comparison is certainly not fair (30k vs 50k iterations). However, the default won't get there even with 50k iterations. I will hopefully find some free cycles to run the...

Thx @ichsan2895 for testing and evaluating. Maybe the degenerated rendering is caused by the bug you reported. I fixed it but lemme check if the rendering looks correct. Btw, yes....

Yep, looks like the ply file is fixed 

@ichsan2895 I am not 100% sure what you are doing? Is this the simple_viewer.py? Then it is loading the ckpts which are not correctly scaled.

@ichsan2895 I never use the simple_viewer so that's why I was a bit puzzled. But I fixed it now. Please pull the latest commit. @liruilong940607 The visual quality is not...

@liruilong940607 I pretty much know what you mean. The paper explicitly reports different values "near vs far". I experimented quite a bit with it. In my experience this method can...

I don't have the complete benchmark yet, but this is default strategy 30k steps main vs this branch. I will run bother later on also under the hogs settings for...