MrLuit
Phishtank linkage suggestion
Phishtank can be used to verify the current status of a scam site with a chance to vote, while URLscan is much tend to record keeping/verifying and analysis purpose. We may consider using both in the right place within the lifecycle and UX suitable for community ecosystem purpose.
Sample (I put some of recent active sites there but not getting attentions. Some of exchanges and myetherwallet are listed as targeting brands of phishing scams)
Now I understand Phishtank is a legacy public and crowdsourced phishing mail collection and validation platform, similar to Amazon Mturk is for catalog data correction and general questioner but looks like old and global rank 200K in Alexa
Phishtank is now failing to capture shots widely through submitted entries. Don't know the exact reason, but lighthouse, which phishtank rely on, has a limitation https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues/5563 and phishers becoming aware of that.
some other contributors saying theirs do not showup. https://lists.phishtank.com/pipermail/phishtank-users/2018-June/thread.html
Please hold research for a while.
Phishtank HAD good linkage to URLscan as shown below endorsing the report, and was candedate of oracle to Ethereum ecosystem. https://urlscan.io/search/#ethfast.io https://urlscan.io/result/0aab72f1-8fe3-4a4f-a42e-d09795999b2b
The other oracles is virustotal
https://www.virustotal.com/#/domain/ethfast.io
6/19 nonsec shows one 6/24 sec show eight.
Those are all organically connected. Thinking about connection modeling by UML or any other modeling notations.
This is record keeping purpose.