Dion Moult

Great news, we can give you access to the ACC project (there are a number of files there exhibiting quite an number of issues reported here for you to isolate...

Cheers, sent :) We're in the middle of delivering this tender but when it's over next week I'll organise a meeting (ideally with the consultants who can reproduce it).

To get around this problem (and similar issues, such as various disciplines not even using storeys (like civil, in-ground services, landscaping, etc), we've started just deleting all spatial elements exported...

@AngelVelezSosa it overrides the exporter's intents because Revit cannot deliver the spatial hierarchy that we needs because Revit limits each file to one site, one building. (so storeys cannot be...

It's definitely a step in the right direction, but instead of doing a "oh, for this object, it's a special case" type of solution, have you considered building an IFC...

In that case yes, your suggestion is definitely an improvement!

Some confusion due to this issue again https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/22173/#Comment_22173

I see two conflicting proposals - one by Kevin who says Pset_RoadDesignCriteriaCommon : IfcRoad ;IfcReferent and one by @larswik who says Pset_RoadDesignCriteriaCommon : IfcAnnotation/USERDEFINED Right now in the docs, I...

No, this is about an attribute, not a property. https://ifc43-docs.standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4x3/HTML/lexical/IfcTypeObject.htm

Just a reminder that quantities currently have special status in the costing, scheduling, and resource management aspects of IFC. E.g. this parametric cost item relationship: https://ifc43-docs.standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4x3/HTML/lexical/IfcCostItem.htm#Figure-6.5.3.2.A-Cost-assignment