Molkobain

CSV import won't be in the functional scope, so the global fix for all types of attributes won't be done in this version. That being said, as this PR already...

Can you give a use case or a reproduction procedure where this would fail? I don't know why the assert was put in the first place, but what it checks...

You are right indeed, I didn't remember. This could be reviewed in another PR I think, it might be ok to remove the assertion. If you make a PR, please...

Hello @GurneyHallack , sorry for the long response time. This was fixed in iTop 3.2.0 which will be released this year.

Yep, it will be documented on iTop 3.2 wiki which will be available along with the package.

What is the status on this PR, I see it's on "pending contributor update". Did we just wanted to rebase on support/3.0 so we could merge it in the 3.0.2?...

Once rebased we can merge :)

Closing PR as Thomas lacks time and we need to move forward with this. See #389

Technical review: We must discuss this with the product team first as it is a functional change (next week). Then will check if the fix is the right one.

Discussed during functional review: * In the backoffice, are you able to download the attachments of the said custom class? I understand that your fix is only on the portal,...