bug: Order annotation doesn't move dependent instances

[jamontes79]

If I have the following code

@singleton
@Order(-1)
class InitFeatureTogglesUseCase {
  InitFeatureTogglesUseCase(
    this._buildConfig,
    this._hiddenSettingsRepository,
    this._featureToggleRepository,
  );

The generated code is the following:

gh.singleton<_i3.InitFeatureTogglesUseCase>(_i3.InitFeatureTogglesUseCase(
      gh<_i4.BuildConfig>(),
      gh<_i5.HiddenSettingsRepository>(),
      gh<_i6.FeatureToggleRepository>(),
    )

But the instances of BuildConfig, HiddenSettingsRepository and FeatureToggleRepository are not instantiated because they have no order.

Any way of doing this without reordering manually all the instances?

Thanks in advance

[vicenterusso]

Same problem. Did you find any solution? My code is heavily based on this structure

[jamontes79]

Same problem. Did you find any solution? My code is heavily based on this structure

I've made a workaround using scopes and grouped some specific classes.

It's not the best approach, but it work for us.

[equescodebelike]

same there, solution with scopes is the best but i found something pricky

@singleton
Future<FooInterface> bar(FooRepository repository, IJohn john, IDoe doe) async {
...
// returns implementation of FooInterface
}

and the point, that I do not use IJohn john and IDoe doe fields in this singleton, but they init first. And i need such order of init

[LordOfTheApples123]

@jamontes79, late reply, but nevertheless Swapping annotations seems to fix the problem

@Order(-1)
@singleton
class InitFeatureTogglesUseCase {
  InitFeatureTogglesUseCase(
    this._buildConfig,
    this._hiddenSettingsRepository,
    this._featureToggleRepository,
  );

allthough you wiil need to register objects you use in constructor before this.

  @Order(-2)
  BuildConfig get config => <...>,
  @Order(-2)
  HiddenSettingsRepository get repo1 => <...>,
  @Order(-2)
  FeatureToggleRepository get repo2 => <...>,

[equescodebelike]

same there, solution with scopes is the best but i found something pricky

@singleton
Future<FooInterface> bar(FooRepository repository, IJohn john, IDoe doe) async {
...
// returns implementation of FooInterface
}

and the point, that I do not use IJohn john and IDoe doe fields in this singleton, but they init first. And i need such order of init

I do not recommend to use my solution, instead try using scopes