Named constructors support
Hi @Milad-Akarie. Thank you for this amazing tool. It's brilliant.
I just would like to know is there a reason why we can't use named constructors in pages? I guess that's a good approach to generate different routes for one the one page which can take different parameters in different cases.
For example:
We have LoginPage with unnamed constructor. As result, we get LoginRouter to navigate to the page.
Imagine, if we can create LoginPage.second constructor, then auto_route will be able to generate two routes, the default one LoginRoute and LoginRoute.second for the named constructor.
I guess that's the best approach to support different parameters for the one page.
How do you think, is that a good idea or there are reasons why we don't need to do that?
Thanks.