Move models to models/ControlNet

[missionfloyd]

I wasn't sure what (if anything) to do with the config files, so I left them where they are.

Fixes #45 Fixes #127

[ljleb]

I think it would be a good idea to additionally update the readme, as otherwise the guidance on where to place the models will be misleading.

[brunogcar]

missing leres, that was added yesterday

btw from my understanding from this, it would create a folder ControlNet-Annotator in models,

i dont think thats the best option, instead, IMO would be better to create individual folders for each of those models, some are already used by other extensions, midas and leres are already used by https://github.com/thygate/stable-diffusion-webui-depthmap-script

that way it would avoid downloading those multiple times, ofc other extensions can use models under ControlNet-Annotator,

(my current models folder)

but thats kinda non written rule, in that case follow what has been done before, ControlNet models are specific to this extension, but the other ones can also be used by others, in fact i believe it will open opportunity for development of extensions like draw by words, etc and those models would be already in place as ControlNet is quite popular and useful

[missionfloyd]

I was wondering if there was a better place for them. If separate folders makes more sense, let's do that.

How's that? https://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet/pull/138/commits/453424fe214f3f4589066cf0632a7027d4748585

[brunogcar]

those models predate ControlNet , that file structure made logic when it was a standalone project, but now its on a framework that shares resources, IMO now makes more sense to place them in root models folder

we all know how powerful controlnet is and how it will influence future development, so it would be a good chance to set standards and examples

newest commit seems good to me, that closes https://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet/issues/45

[Mikubill]

Also close #127 #129. Thanks for your contribution!