Michaël

> > If the shortcuts can be changed without user approval, are they shortcuts such as "pressing" a button? > > I may be misunderstanding the question, so feel free...

It would be better to warn the user when shortcuts are assigned to delete/destructive actions. However, even if it would be possible to detect such actions, these shortcuts must be...

I used the "destructive" action just to be general, referring to the term used in GNOME. Another destructive action other than "Delete" is "Discard", for example. If it's already communicated,...

Yes. In terms of shortcuts, it also means speak the action. And, if I'm not wrong, if your app has its own feedback (voices, use of refreshable braille display), that's...

What's the goal here? - That apps access network mounts to be able to present them in their user interface? - Or that apps have the ability to open and...

See also https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/discussions/1287#discussioncomment-8563224. Important: The app can't acquire network access with network mounts.

The problem is that if an app has its own things to adapt to the user's vision, then it should logically know if a filter is active in order to...

Hello @lxwulf! It is known. See https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/issues/1093

Unfortunately, I don't know anything.

Hello Jonas, I think this requires organization by use case: progress notifications, alarms, calls/messages (contacts), weather/amber alerts... And those use cases may have other conditions. Examples (non-exhaustive): - Progress notifications....