Michaël

> static permissions aren't bad as a whole, and in many cases they're wanted / necessary. You need to see if these wanted / necessary static permissions can be converted...

Any news at least on the permission revocation part? This functionality still remains interesting for what it offers. A simple solution could certainly be found, without getting into user management...

Globally, from my side: - Permission revocation. OK. - Entitlement for notifications, with allowing only declared notifications. OK. At least, it seems to be a solution for notifications for which...

- Permission Bypass. Maybe if it is user configurable. This would be an opt-in option of a repository (to be discussed further on what exactly to do). - Spam prevention...

@bragefuglseth: Thanks for redirecting me to the issue! The problem is really asking to reduce protection. This shouldn't be asked from a (fully) sandboxed app at all. This shows bad...

Same kind of error but for `flatpak install`: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/3621

@fabrixx: This could be due to a repository update in progress, causing the wrong data to be downloaded at that time. Waiting should resolve such an issue.

Seems reasonable. > Users should not be aware of concepts like caches and their usual process of fixing things is removing and installing something again. Note that in GNOME we...

> do you mean when updating? gnome software already does and i think the cli does too As rusty-snake pointed out, no. However, it could be considered. Personally, I have...

Closed because I no longer trust