Mike Thompson

_That_ would be a bug! Can you issue a PR to fix? (and thanks for the catch)

> I cannot at this point, as the contribution to this repo is still a pending topic. Can you expand on this? Are you saying that NXP is still trying...

> anything the make clones should really be in a subdirectory of the core Keep in mind that the current structure of CORE-V-VERIF is such that is it a distinct...

Glad to hear you've resolved the issue @Clay-Cui. Would you be willing to contribute a pull-request to this repo to ensure the fix is available to everyone? Thanks!

Hi @khandelwaltanuj, thanks for your interest in OpenHW. I assume you are referring to [lib/cv_dv_utils/uvm/memory_rsp_model/memory_response_if.sv](https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-verif/blob/d46633081bfe67daed840d953e0d759241be6ff0/lib/cv_dv_utils/uvm/memory_rsp_model/memory_response_if.sv#L154). Please confirm. Hi @ludovicpion, can you comment?

Thanks for the confirmation @ludovicpion. Can you answer @khandelwaltanuj's question as to why the signal `rd_res_ex_fail` is never driven?

Hi @khandelwaltanuj, please close this issue if you are satisfied it is fixed now that #2390 is merged in. Thanks!

Hi @frikhaAziz, can you investigate this issue?

Hi @ASintzoff. @JeanRochCoulon let me know that @frikhaAziz has completed his internship, so I am assigning this one to you.

The IP Block table in the [Memory Map](https://docs.openhwgroup.org/projects/core-v-mcu/doc-src/mmap.html#memory-map) chapter. See pull-request #285