Mike McCready

@AtofStryker > [@MikeMcC399](https://github.com/MikeMcC399) I am not currently planning to submit the PRs to do the trusted publishing work, mostly just file issues and prioritize. That being said, if you want...

@syedali237 > I found that there's no node24-compatible version of actions/cache available yet, we should monitor and update our documentation once a node24 version is released. The text of the...

[actions/[email protected]](https://github.com/actions/cache/releases/tag/v5.0.0) was released on Dec 11, 2025 and this is set up for runs.using `node24`. - PR #1606 is submitted to update accordingly

@DanielYang59 > I'm not sure if this is an [isemail](https://github.com/skeggse/isemail) issue though, but I noticed it's no longer maintained: - See https://github.com/tcort/markdown-link-check/issues/371

@DanielYang59 > Thanks for letting me know. I don't know much about the internal working of `markdown-link-check ` so not sure if I should propagate the issue to actual worker...

Based on https://github.com/tcort/markdown-link-check/issues/378#issuecomment-2522348292 this would still be an open issue as the referenced code https://github.com/tcort/link-check/blob/master/lib/proto/mailto.js was last changed in Oct 2024 when isemail was replaced.

This issue is still open and reproducible. `markdown-link-check` does not respect the syntax of [RFC 6068 - The 'mailto' URI Scheme](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6068) for multiple e-mail addresses, and logs a `400` error....

The last release was [v3.13.7](https://github.com/tcort/markdown-link-check/releases/tag/v3.13.7) on March 11, 2025 which is 6 months ago. I suggest to increase the stale-bot time-frame accordingly. There is no point in flagging an issue...

@tcort / @DanielYang59 - I believe that this issue has been prematurely closed due to PR https://github.com/tcort/link-check/pull/106 including an auto-close for this issue (https://github.com/tcort/markdown-link-check/issues/378) - Now, although https://github.com/tcort/link-check/pull/106 resulted in...

@jkjustjoshing This looks like a misinterpretation https://docs.cypress.io/api/node-events/after-spec-api#Syntax https://docs.cypress.io/app/references/configuration#Experiments https://docs.cypress.io/app/references/experiments