Michael Eischer

@RubenKelevra Can you test whether #2997 improves the exclude/include performance enough to call it reasonable? [Edit]It should be enough to process a few hundred files per second, but it's probably...

Thanks for the testing. I just noticed that speeding up individual exclude checks for an exclude file with 350k entries enough to process 10k files per second, obviously can't work...

What you're seeing is probably a combination of multiple problems: The backup pipeline has currently a limited parallelism which will be fixed by #3611 and #3489. The other part is...

@JaCoB1123 can you provide some details on which snapshot was affected? Was it an old one or a very recent one?

Do you still have a log of the first `prune` run which failed while writing the index files? The next prune run which failed with `Fatal: Repack: Load: write /tmp/restic-temp-649904104:...

Thanks anyways. That sounds like something could have gone wrong with refreshing the lock file that's held by backup and prune. At least that theory would explain why only a...

> Backup happens to a local minio instance - not sure if that could have something to do with it. The logs show that 6 pack files have lost all...

Hmm, I'm not particularly convinced by that option (or rather the four of them). Having to precisely specify each symlink makes it quite easy to get it wrong. How and...

That looks very similar to a data loss issue we have recently fixed in rest-server restic/rest-server#142 (included in rest-server 0.11.0). As you're storing the repository locally, is there a particular...

@fd0 in principle yes. However, judging from the discussion in https://github.com/rclone/rclone/issues/6329 that would require quite a bit of internal changes in rclone.