Michael Eischer
Michael Eischer
That effectively means that it would be enough to have the option to store files and directories such that they are group accessible. Then you can use ACLs to grant...
I've rebased the PR to fix the conflict with the new `BaseChunker` struct. As the latter is not released yet, I've just cut down the interface to only provide the...
I've merged #145 instead of the Dockerfile changes here.
> rest-server_1 | **WARNING** No user exists, please 'docker exec -it $CONTAINER_ID create_user' This line shouldn't be printed if the environment variable `DISABLE_AUTHENTICATION` is properly set. The same applies to...
Closing as this seems to be an issue with calling the container and there hasn't been any feedback.
Wouldn't it be easier to just let the reverse proxy check that the username and path prefix match? Since #112 all `--private-repos` does is verify that the first part of...
@GeorgFoc Basic-Auth at rest-server also works without enabling TLS. So, I don't understand what you need the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header for.
@mlusetti I think fd0 intentionally removed the "make it go 1.14 buildable" commit as it is no longer necessary after rebasing to the current master branch.
Which checks do we really need for a `/health` endpoint? Checking whether there is enough free space to store at least one pack file is mostly of academic interest. After...
> I like the idea in general, but I'm not sure the logic is correctly implemented yet. Are you worried about anything in particular? Or is it just the total...