Michael

> (btw: your blue square is not an exact match of the X) [Read this.](https://freetype.org/freetype2/docs/glyphs/index.html) particularly II.2.

> it is about what "size" means In OpenSCAD `size=` means pts on a 100dpi resolution output device. For backward compatibility it will likely be that way for a long...

a. `size=` is not likely to change, for a whole bunch of reasons. b. so what's wrong with using `points=` if you want to work in points? There is a...

No, and it's after midnight so I'll be brief, `size=` is based on 100 units, that is what it is, and for a typical English letter the cap-height-ish ink-size is...

Now `size=` should not be redefined for lots of reasons. What is the problem of introducing, as discussed above: > Ah, duh, yes. I was thinking the new parameter would...

Good night.

Or rather, I don't care. If the consensus is to break backward compatibility of `size=`, go ahead. OUT.

Well there are very good reasons for Immutable variable. I would not support that change. I fully support your effort to improve the code base by implementing any of your...

I have a few systems and was Win7 exclusively for a while, but needed a new one as the box was failing. This was my everyday PC. It started failing...

Is OpenSCAD on Windows 7 officially dead?