Miaha

Now that discard patch layer has been added to Copa, adding OCI support will require storing the base image in OCI annotations, as well as determining whether the image being...

I've been looking into Wolfi based images and so far I've discovered the following: - `Wolfi-base` utilizes the APK package manager, but the rest of the Wolfi images are completely...

There's a little issue with supporting Wolfi images, but additional input would be appreciated here. Below is a direct quote from Chainguard themselves, hidden away in their docs: > Mixing...

After investigation, the Copa team has decided that Wolfi support will not be added due to how complex the implementation would have to be. Docs will be updated to indicate...

In semantic versioning terms, if major.minor.patch is being passed in, are we only wanting to return major.minor and discarding the patch versioning? For example, if we pass in Alpine `3.17.5`,...

After rather extensive testing I think we already have this implemented. With Debian, if I pass in `12.6`, `11.1`, etc. we always use `major-slim`. With Ubuntu, all images I pass...

Taking a look at this now. Would it be best to add a Copa flag for end users to specify a repository if they desire, otherwise falling back on default...

APKO images appear to be detected as `osType Wolfi` so this issue can't be worked on until issue #38 is closed.

After investigation, the Copa team has decided that Wolfi support will not be added due to how complex the implementation would have to be. Docs will be updated to indicate...

Copa currently detects a file which indicates RPM support at `/var/lib/rpm/Packages`, which in turn makes Copa assume the container isn't distroless. I ran the debugger in GoLand to identify exactly...