Sam
Sam
I vote for using `&&`, `||`, `!` and not introducing yet more operators that do almost the exact same thing.
@HaloFour What's better? A feature that's ambiguous for the developer or one that's ambiguous for the compiler? If they can't implement with the existing operators, it's not worth doing. This...
From LDM notes: > We have sympathy. It feels like a corner that's cut. But it's quite expensive to implement, and has semantic dark corners (List.First.Foo). Is this still the...