Dan Dawson
Ok, I solved the problem. My gh-pages branch (which already existed) did not have a ".nojekyll" file in the root. I was under the impression that doctr created this file,...
Thank you for the reply! Should I close this issue or would you prefer we leave it open in case there's something you wanted to change in response to it?
@AndrewILWilliams I took a look at the ACT approach you mentioned, and I don't think it's correct. I need to take a closer look to be sure, but unless I'm...
This still doesn't look correct. I'd have to take a look at the code, but from just looking at the plot above, the LCL should not be any different from...
@mgrover1, I should be clear that I appreciate that you are taking the initiative here, and hope I'm not coming across as overly pedantic.
Don't correct the parcel profile until after the whole thing is computed. Here you are computing the lower part of the profile, then correcting it, then computing the upper part...
Think of it this way.... as far as the parcel is concerned, as it is lifted, its temperature will change based on the dry and moist adiabatic lapse rates. It's...
This is why you should use the original parcel T and Td to compute its profile, including the dry adiabatic layer below the LCL, the LCL itself, and the moist...
> [The classic paper on this subject](https://github.com/jrleeman/CAPE-SciPy-2017/blob/master/Doswell_Rasmussen_1994.pdf) contains a few soundings that could be used as additional test cases, assuming the Wyoming server has them. Yes, I was going to...
Looks good!