metamask-extension
metamask-extension copied to clipboard
Specify that Ancient8 is a multilayer network
Description
Ancient8 is also based on the OP stack, so follows the same gas rules as Optimism and Base. This closely follows the form of https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/20097.
Related issues
Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/20097
Manual testing steps
-
Open the extension
-
Add the Ancient8 network using the following information
Chain name: Ancient8 Chain Id: 888888888 Chain RPC: https://rpc.ancient8.gg
- Send some transactions
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
- [x] I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
- [x] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
- [x] I've linked related issues
- [x] I've included manual testing steps
- [x] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [x] I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
- [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
- [x] I’ve properly set the pull request status:
- [x] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
- [x] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".
Pre-merge reviewer checklist
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.
for context, this PR is for adding support to show L1 fees for ancient8 network based on OP Stack deployed with Conduit
similar stuff asked for Zora
https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/20501
is this the correct process to support a multilayer network on Metamask? @brad-decker
thanks!
Hi @0xtrou, thank you for your PR! The team will work through it soon (expect ~2 weeks).
Thank you @bschorchit
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
hey how is thing going @bschorchit ser
Hey, the team will be wrapping up a work this week that is currently blocking moving on to this. Sorry for the delay, but we're planning to get to this soon.
Hi pals, I know you guys are super busy, but any chances I can know if there were any ETA for this issue?
Thanks very much @bschorchit
any update on this @bschorchit ?
This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 60 days. It will be closed in 14 days. Thank you for your contributions.
This PR was closed because there has been no follow up activity in the last 14 days. Thank you for your contributions.