Add tinyllama model agent
User description
This agent uses the TinyLlama-1.1B model to generate code or responses based on user input prompts. It demonstrates a minimal setup for building an AI assistant using Hugging Face Transformers with a lightweight language model.
PR Type
Documentation
Description
-
Added five new Jupyter notebooks in the
examples/cookbooksdirectory, each demonstrating practical AI agent use cases with detailed instructions and code examples. -
Introduced a notebook for using the TinyLlama-1.1B model as a simple AI agent, including setup, response generation, and usage demonstration.
-
Added a comprehensive code analysis agent notebook, featuring structured reporting with Pydantic schemas and example analysis workflows.
-
Provided a predictive maintenance workflow notebook showcasing multi-agent orchestration for sensor data analysis, anomaly detection, and maintenance scheduling.
-
Included a beginner-friendly notebook for the Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct model, guiding users through chat-based generation tasks.
-
Added a Gemma 2B instruction agent notebook, covering model setup, prompt configuration, inference, and model saving for instruction following and code generation.
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation |
|
Need help?
Type /help how to ...in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.Check out the documentation for more information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
- New Features
- Added a "Code Analysis Agent" example notebook demonstrating AI-driven code quality assessment, including detailed metrics and recommendations.
- Introduced a "Gemma 2B Instruction Agent" example notebook showing how to use and fine-tune the Gemma 2B language model for instruction-based tasks.
- Added a "Predictive Maintenance Multi-Agent Workflow" example notebook showcasing a multi-agent system for predictive maintenance using simulated sensor data and AI agents.
- Introduced a "Qwen2.5 Instruction Agent" example notebook providing a step-by-step guide for chat-based interactions with the Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct model.
Walkthrough
One notebook's "Open in Colab" badge URL is corrected to match the filename. Four new Jupyter notebooks are added demonstrating various AI agents and workflows: Gemma 2B instruction agent, predictive maintenance multi-agent workflow, Qwen2.5 instruction agent, and TinyLlama simple AI agent. These cover setup, model loading, inference, multi-agent orchestration, and saving models.
Changes
| File(s) | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| examples/cookbooks/Code_Analysis_Agent.ipynb | Updates "Open in Colab" badge URL to match notebook filename casing; no other changes. |
| examples/cookbooks/Gemma2B_Instruction_Agent.ipynb | Adds notebook demonstrating data prep, inference, and saving with Gemma 2B instruction model. |
| examples/cookbooks/Predictive_Maintenance_Multi_Agent_Workflow.ipynb | Adds notebook for multi-agent predictive maintenance workflow using PraisonAIAgents framework. |
| examples/cookbooks/Qwen2_5_InstructionAgent.ipynb | Adds notebook for chat-based generation with Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct model. |
| examples/cookbooks/TinyLlama_1_1B_model_SimpleAIAgent.ipynb | Adds notebook demonstrating a simple AI agent using TinyLlama 1.1B model with generation function. |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Notebook
participant AI_Agent
participant Model/Workflow
User->>Notebook: Run notebook cells
Notebook->>Model/Workflow: Setup (install, import, authenticate)
Notebook->>AI_Agent: Define/configure agent(s) and tasks
Notebook->>Model/Workflow: Provide input (code, prompt, data)
Model/Workflow->>AI_Agent: Analyze/process/generate output
AI_Agent->>Notebook: Return results
Notebook->>User: Display structured output/results
Possibly related PRs
- MervinPraison/PraisonAI#600: Both PRs modify the same Code_Analysis_Agent notebook; this PR updates the badge URL while the other adds the notebook content, making them directly related.
Poem
🐇✨
A badge corrected, links aligned,
New agents born, their skills combined.
Gemma chats and Qwen replies,
TinyLlama's wisdom flies.
Maintenance agents watch and learn,
In notebooks fresh, the rabbits turn—
Hopping through code, new paths discern! 🥕📚
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪ |
| 🧪 No relevant tests |
| 🔒 Security concerns Sensitive information exposure: |
⚡ Recommended focus areas for reviewHardcoded Token
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
| Category | Suggestion | Impact |
| Security |
Secure API key handlingHardcoding API keys directly in the notebook is a security risk. Use a more examples/cookbooks/Predictive_Maintenance_Multi_Agent_Workflow.ipynb [66]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7__ Why: Valid security concern about hardcoded API keys. The suggestion provides practical alternatives and accurately identifies the security risk, though it's an error handling/security suggestion which caps the score. | Medium |
Remove hardcoded API keyHardcoding API keys directly in notebooks is a security risk. Consider using examples/cookbooks/Code_Analysis_Agent.ipynb [67]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6__ Why: While this is a security best practice, the code uses | Low | |
| General |
Fix repository referenceThe Colab link points to a personal fork rather than the official repository. examples/cookbooks/Code_Analysis_Agent.ipynb [17]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7__ Why: The Colab link points to a personal fork instead of the official | Medium |
| Possible issue |
Add error handlingThe function doesn't handle potential CUDA out-of-memory errors that could occur examples/cookbooks/TinyLlama_1_1B_model_SimpleAIAgent.ipynb [305-308]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6__ Why: This suggestion adds useful error handling for CUDA out-of-memory scenarios which is a common issue when working with large language models. The fallback to CPU processing provides graceful degradation, though as an error handling improvement it receives a moderate score. | Low |
Fix authentication methodThe login function is called with a placeholder token value that requires user examples/cookbooks/Gemma2B_Instruction_Agent.ipynb [356]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6__ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that using a placeholder token will cause authentication failures, but there's a minor discrepancy in the | Low | |
| ||
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 16.43%. Comparing base (
60fd485) to head (70057d9). Report is 77 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #608 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 16.43% 16.43%
=======================================
Files 24 24
Lines 2160 2160
Branches 302 302
=======================================
Hits 355 355
Misses 1789 1789
Partials 16 16
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| quick-validation | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| unit-tests | 16.43% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.