MegaIng

Is there a problem with creating your own method? It is not very complex.

@erezsh It might in general be worth considering creating a FAQs/best practices/common misunderstanding page.

Not necessarily repetitive (right now), but tricks that can't really be fixed and should be documented somewhere. Of course, we can just keep them in issues, but I think adding...

> We already use '' as a magic constant. I think anything else shouldn't concern us. ?? > RE_FLAGS isn't a good enough reason for having a recursive import. Fair...

My idea was to always fall back to `lark` in case people have grammars named `.grammar` or `.g` or something like that.

That reminds me, we should also because of this start loading files with different extensions.

It isn't yet implemented for the `transformer`parameter.

If you want to get the Tree use `@v_args(tree=True)`. It is a bug that you are getting the Tree at first I think. And no, it isn't an empty Transformer....

Also, when used as an embedded Transformer, there isn't a difference between In-place and the normal Transformer (expect this Bug)

All that default does it create a `Tree` object. You can do that yourself: ``` from lark import Tree def number_over_number(children): return Tree('number_over_number', children) ``` The only think that `__default__`...