Max Kellermann

I don't think XCSoar should put a meaning in "overload factor". It's a bad metric, it's useless for calculations (you need to derive the ballast mass from it before you...

Of course, for glide path calculations, only the actual mass (or rather: weight! yes! .. which includes G load) of the glider is relevant, and knowing the amount of pilot...

3b08f28a5addab8bd3655ef1a3d6e9fc636caac0 is not the cause. I bet a bisect would track it down to 0f0d6a63343c7f33e086f8086de0903a616c5ac5, which reverts a bad commit, but meanwhile another commit had modified the icon sizes to...

Can somebody please explain f2d0e21a95bba191f6e211456b6e6b06331622b2 to me? @Sundown3867 / @lordfolken ? It enlarged map icons from 5x6 pixels to 22x22 pixels, for some definition of "pixel". But what definition of...

@Sundown3867, you answered none of my questions. > As you can see, old icon .svgs have all physical sizes Pixels are not "physical". A physical size unit would be "mm"...

> for the .svg code - that is default output of the Inkscape .svg file, which contains some bloat. It can be reduced by saving as optimized graphics - I...

~No, that doesn't help, sorry - it's bullshit.~ Sorry, that was actually not so much bullshit. Turns out SVG (and CSS) don't mean "pixels" when they say "pixels", but 1/96th...

There is very much wrong with that commit, but you ignore everything I said about it (you don't have answers to my questions, do you?), and reframe the breakages caused...

No, these are questions, not accusations. When somebody does something, but doesn't document it properly, I always assume they have a plan, and then I ask questions to find out...

> 32x32px is 8.467x8.467mm in Inscape if that helps Sorry. One *very* last post, because I had a simple idea I had to verify, and [somebody is wrong on the...