as-string-sink icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
as-string-sink copied to clipboard

An efficient dynamically sized string buffer (aka String Builder) for AssemblyScript

String Sink

npm

An efficient dynamically sized string buffer (aka String Builder) for AssemblyScript.

Interface

class StringSink {
  static withCapacity(capacity: i32)

  constructor(initial: string = "", capacity: i32 = 32)

  get length(): i32
  get capacity(): i32

  // Append sting or substring
  write(src: string, start?: i32, end?: i32): void
  // Append sting or substring with new line
  writeLn(src?: string, start?: i32, end?: i32): void
  // Append single code point
  writeCodePoint(code: i32): void
  // Append any integer or floating point number
  writeNumber<T>(value: T): void

  reserve(capacity: i32, clear?: bool): void
  shrink(): void
  clear(): void

  // Convert buffer to normal string
  toString(): string
}

Benchmark Results

StringSink can be up to 4000 times faster than naive string concatenation! And up to 6 times faster than JS concat which uses rope data structure under the hood.

100 strings:

String += JS:  0.019 ms
String += AS:  0.016 ms
StringSink AS: 0.0043 ms `(4x)`

50,000 strings:

String += JS:  3.70 ms
String += AS:  526.16 ms
StringSink AS: 0.48 ms `(1096x)`

200,000 strings:

String += JS:  11.95 ms
String += AS:  8236.82 ms
StringSink AS: 2.01 ms `(4097x)`

Usage 1. String accumulation (+=)

non efficient example:

function toList(arr: string[]): string {
  let res = "";
  for (let i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
    res += arr[i] + "\n";
  }
  return res;
}

efficient with StringSink:

function toList(arr: string[]): string {
  let res = new StringSink();
  for (let i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
    res.write(arr[i] + "\n");
  }
  return res.toString();
}

even more efficient:

function toList(arr: string[]): string {
  let res = new StringSink();
  for (let i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
    res.writeLn(arr[i]);
  }
  return res.toString();
}

Complex example:

function zipAndStringify(names: string[], ages: i32[]): string {
  assert(names.length == ages.length);

  let res = new StringSink();
  res.writeLn('[');
  for (let i = 0, len = names.length; i < len; i++) {
    res.write('  { name: "');
    res.write(names[i]);
    res.write('", age: ');
    res.writeNumber(ages[i]);
    res.writeLn(' },');
  }
  res.write(']');
  return res.toString();
}

assert(zipAndStringify(
  ["Alan", "Elon", "John D."],
  [109, 50, 51]
) == `[
  { name: "Alan", age: 109 },
  { name: "Elon", age: 50 },
  { name: "John D.", age: 51 },
]`);

Usage 2. String accumulation (+=) only part of string

non efficient example:

function toListSliced(arr: string[]): string {
  let res = "";
  for (let i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
    res += arr[i].substring(1, 3);
  }
  return res;
}

more efficient with StringSink:

function toListSliced(arr: string[]): string {
  let res = new StringSink();
  for (let i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
    res.write(arr[i], 1, 3);
  }
  return res.toString();
}