Maverickwoe
Maverickwoe
Hey @Saschl . Just wanted to know if you had any feedback from the team ?
@Saschl awesome. Glad it's in progress. If you need any help on the documentation, I'm here
Hi @donstim thanks for the feedbacks 1/ yes I can work with them as already proposed though I don't know who those people are. Please ask them to contact me...
@donstim Please see the following changes: "All systems" instead of "All failures" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/432d4/432d41e352622997bf13e51a6c537387c24f0782" alt="image" Default selection and title make it clearer that the user has to select something to add a...
> That's quite a diagram for the takeoff generator! It might be better to re-name the "maximum speed" to "speed transition medium-high (knots)" to be consistent with the low-medium speed...
Changed the info page: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88940/8894028274eca0380727c3f33ffdd125852ede3c" alt="image"
> Still a bit troubled by the apparent inconsistency in setting a maximum number of simultaneous failures that only limits the number of failures if more than one failure generator...
> be a while before the gamut of engine failures can be added. Would it be possible before then to simply add a left and right engine fuel cut capability...
Many thanks for your work @Letreivchen Here are my comments _**Change the number of maximum simultaneous failures to any reasonable value and verify it is showing the new value --NOT...
Test procedure updated to correct improper setting for take off gen tests. Moved the "Max number of simultaneous failures" as a setting of each gen