Matthias Wiesmann

Pull request: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/3447

Note that these replacements have no actual effect, as the the more generic type takes precedence anyway when the documentation is generated. So whatever intent was present is not surfaced...

For schema.org, there is a proposal to map the IPTC tags values here, which I feel would be relevant: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/3392

So the proposal would be a subproject in https://schema.org/Project ?

Would it make sense to extend the definition of [telephone](https://schema.org/telephone) to also accept links and specify that it should contain a tel: link?

> At first glance, I can't say I'm crazy about the idea of introducing AND/OR assumptions. Assuming subjects have any relation based on the fact they're both objects of the...

Something like this (pseudo JSON): ```JSON [{ "@id": "plant123" "@type": "Organization", "name": " Plant 123", "hasCertification": { "type": "Certification", "name": "ISO 22000/Meat" } }, { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Mike's Poultry",...

Do you have any application or system that would consume this data in mind?

Note that you can use [additionalType](https://schema.org/additionalType) to specify more precise custom types.

You can define language directly in JSON-ld https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/#string-internationalization